Charting a Path Forward for the Oncology Care Model

The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is a Federal health reform program that aims to change the way cancer care in America is delivered. Its goal? To provide high quality, well-coordinated cancer care to patients while reducing costs for Medicare and beneficiaries. Eager to be involved in the future of cancer care, nearly

By |2022-09-01T13:33:45-04:00January 1st, 2018|Issue Briefs & Overviews, Research & Publications, Studies|Comments Off on Charting a Path Forward for the Oncology Care Model

How Abuse of the 340B Program is Hurting Patients

The 340B Drug Discount program exemplifies how good ideas, no matter how well-intended,  can easily go bad if they fall into the wrong hands and are abused. Ultimately, abuse of the 340B program has begun to harm the very poor, uninsured, and underinsured patients it was meant to serve. 340B is a critically important

By |2022-12-27T17:05:51-05:00September 1st, 2017|Issue Briefs & Overviews, Research & Publications|Comments Off on How Abuse of the 340B Program is Hurting Patients

MACRA Proposed Rule Summary: Impact for Oncologists

MACRA Proposed Rule Summary: Impact for Oncologists On June 20, 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) posted the 2018 Quality Payment Program (QPP) Proposed Rule (CMS-5522-P) which is updated annually as part of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA). The Community Oncology Alliance

By |2022-12-27T17:06:13-05:00July 1st, 2017|Issue Briefs & Overviews, Research & Publications|Comments Off on MACRA Proposed Rule Summary: Impact for Oncologists

The 340B Program in Review: A Look at the Data and Evidence to Date

Since its inception, the 340B Drug Discount Program has been the subject of countless research studies, white papers, and analyses looking at its substantial growth and role in the United States’ health care system. This paper seeks to provide a review of the data and evidence provided by studies of the 340B program to

By |2022-12-27T17:06:35-05:00April 1st, 2017|Issue Briefs & Overviews, Research & Publications|Comments Off on The 340B Program in Review: A Look at the Data and Evidence to Date

February 13: Presentation to the Coalition of Hematology Oncology Practices (CHOP) 2017 Business Summit

Presentation to the  Coalition of Hematology Oncology Practices (CHOP)  “From Capitol Hill to Fort Worth…Oncology Policy in the Whacky World of Washington, DC” given on February 10, 2017. Click here to download the slides.

By |2022-09-01T13:28:30-04:00February 13th, 2017|Issue Briefs & Overviews, Research & Publications|Comments Off on February 13: Presentation to the Coalition of Hematology Oncology Practices (CHOP) 2017 Business Summit

January 23: Presentation to The New Jersey Society of Oncology Managers (NJSOM)

Presentation to the New Jersey Society of Oncology Managers (NJSOM) “From Capitol Hill to Bridgewater…A Crystal Ball Look at Oncology Policy for 2017 and Beyond” given on January 20, 2017. Click here to download the slides      

By |2022-09-01T13:28:31-04:00January 23rd, 2017|Issue Briefs & Overviews, Research & Publications|Comments Off on January 23: Presentation to The New Jersey Society of Oncology Managers (NJSOM)

The Legal and Constitutional Case: Why CMS Did Not Have the Authority to Apply the Sequester Cut to Medicare Part B Drug Reimbursement

For years, the budget of the Obama Administration included a reimbursement payment cut to Medicare Part B drugs, which are generally infusible drugs to treat cancer and other complex, potentially life-threating diseases administered in a clinical setting. However, Congress has fixed Medicare Part B drug reimbursement in statute with the Medicare Modernization Act of

By |2022-12-27T16:59:13-05:00January 1st, 2017|Issue Briefs & Overviews|Comments Off on The Legal and Constitutional Case: Why CMS Did Not Have the Authority to Apply the Sequester Cut to Medicare Part B Drug Reimbursement